Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANFORD et al v. H.S.B.C BANK et al
as 1:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. STANFORD and SOFTWHO
Defendant:
H.S.B.C BANK, BANK OF THE OZARKS, CHASE BANK, U.S. BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VILCHUCK v. CENTURION OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
SETH ADAM VILCHUCK
Defendant:
CENTURION OF INDIANA, LISA HAMBLEN, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keys v. Williamson et al
as 2:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Terry Keys
Defendant:
Pat Williamson, Dr. Tchatchet and Missy Geesa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keys v. Varnado et al
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Stephen Keys
Defendant:
Temple Varnado, D&T Transportation LLC and Hastings Mutual Insurance Co.
Not Classified By Court:
Galen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
KEYS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER K. KEYS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Swick v. Key Bank
as 3:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Key Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv00518
Petitioner:
DAJUAN KEY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
