Cases 1 - 10 of 2,800
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Eric Higgins and Lucky 8 TV Productions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Counice et al
as 4:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Bessie L Counice, Justin Minor and Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stephan L Marshall
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
National Trust Insurance Company v. L&E Consulting, LLC
as 5:2024cv05099
Plaintiff:
National Trust Insurance Company
Defendant:
L&E Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Marrone et al v. Lamb et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Mason Marrone and Rebecca Marrone
Defendant:
Brenton David Lamb and L & T Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Sherman v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05084
Plaintiff:
Ebony L. Porter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
