Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Simpkins v. Starasoler et al
as 1:2026cv24184
Plaintiff:
Felix T. Simpkins
Defendant:
Tracy Starasoler, Llorens M. Sanchez, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ibanez v. Marion County Jail et al
as 1:2026cv23492
Plaintiff:
Moises Navarro Ibanez
Defendant:
Marion County Jail, Officer D. Canelle and Officer Llorens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00311
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sievers v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2026cv00058
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Sievers
Defendant:
Dr. Verona, Dr. Asbelti Llorens, Ms. Jessica Putney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gordon v. A. Llorens, et al
as 25-14421
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. GORDON
Defendant:
A. LLORENS and ANGELA STRONG
Gordon v. Llorens et al
as 3:2025cv01310
Plaintiff:
Michael Gordon
Defendant:
Dr. A. Llorens and Angela Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abd ul, Jabbaar v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2025cv24639
Plaintiff:
Jabbaar Mujaahid Abd ul and Jabbaar M Abdul
Defendant:
State of Florida, Miami City, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Cruz-Rivera
as 25-1899
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CARLOS CRUZ-RIVERA, a/k/a Chiqui, a/k/a Cano, a/k/a Cano Llorens
Simpkins v. Starasoler et al
as 1:2025cv23522
Plaintiff:
Felix T. Simpkins
Defendant:
Tracy Starasoler, Llorens M. Sanchez, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv23469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
