Cases 1 - 10 of 341
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hill v. Wise, et al.
as 24-605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD WISE, Unit Sgt., 2nd-shift, JON COERS, Classification Counselor 1, AARON KERSHAW, Unit Sgt., 3rd-shift and others
Tyrece Jefferson v. G. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jefferson v. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2023cv02790
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
David Baughman, C. Lacy, B. Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro Lomeli v. Warden
as 2:2023cv09461
Petitioner:
Pedro Lomeli
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Roberts v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2023cv05149
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Roberts, Jr and Joe JW Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Crystal Gutierrez, James Kent, Mark McClanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornejo v. Minglana et al
as 4:2023cv05383
Plaintiff:
Efrain Cornejo
Defendant:
Sergeant V. Minglana, T. Clayton, C.H. Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
