Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wright et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv05018
Plaintiff:
Thelma Wright and Jacob Jones
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, OFFICER SZCZUR Star No. 18774, Officer Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Loza v. United States
as 1:2021cv03607
Plaintiff:
Mr. Javier Gonzalez-Loza
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Estate of Ramon A Echeverria Loza et al v. H&P Trucking LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00525
Plaintiff:
Pioneer Specialty Insurance Company, Estate of Ramon A Echeverria Loza and Roccio A Guerrero
Defendant:
Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association Risk Retention Group Inc, Jeremy J Phelps and H&P Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mims v. Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00260
Defendant:
Officer Pronek, Officer Maldonado, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Pharrish Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv04521
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Harris
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation, Danilo Loza, Matthew Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hartsell v. Schaaf et al
as 3:2020cv00505
Defendant:
David Duis, Loza, Schaaf and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartsell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. P.O. Szczur #18774 et al
as 1:2019cv07363
Defendant:
P.O. Loza #16201, P.O. Ahmed #16497, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Dione Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
