Cases 1 - 10 of 427
Rivera-Lugo et al v. ShopSabre Holdings Blocker, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01184
Plaintiff:
Jan Rivera-Lugo and Siempre Nunca LLC
Defendant:
ShopSabre Holdings Blocker, LLC, Numerically Automated Cutting System LLC, ShopSabre CNC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In Re: Santiago-Lugo
as 24-1373
Petitioner:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC., BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, as claimant of One Urban Lot #72, located at Ibiza St., Paseo Las Brisas, RP. and others
US v. Lugo-Montalvo
as 24-1344
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALAN LUGO-MONTALVO, a/k/a Allan Lugo-Montalvo
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD, OSCAR JOSE SERRANO NEGRON and KEHYLIS YOLANDA VAZQUEZ-TORRES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Castro v. Romero-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
Ramon E. Castro
Defendant:
Miguel A. Romero-Lugo, Conjugal Partnership Romero-Doe, Vanessa Y. Jimenez-Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fortaleza Equity Partners REO I, LLC v. Silva-Navarro
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
FORTALEZA EQUITY PARTNERS I, LLC and ROOSEVELT CAYMAN ASSETS COMPANY I
Defendant:
VIRGINIA SILVA-NAVARRO, ISABEL LUGO-VELEZ, UNITED STATES and others
Mahoney et al v. Bowers et al
as 4:2023cv40167
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Mahoney and George Curran
Defendant:
Bowers, Patricia Ruze, Dr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
