Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
United States of America v. Smith & Wesson Model M&P Shield EZ .380 cal Pistol et al
as 2:2023cv12446
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Smith & Wesson Model M&P Shield EZ .380 cal Pistol, 19 Rounds of .380 cal ammo, SCCY Industries Model CPX-1 9mm cal Pistol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. One (1) Smith & Wesson M&P, 45 Pistol, CAL:45 SN:DXV1150 et al
as 2:2023cv02565
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One (1) Smith & Wesson M&P, 45 Pistol, CAL:45 SN:DXV1150, One (1) Glock GMBH 22 Pistol, CAL:40 SN:TGS716 and One (1) Ruger Ruger-57 Pistol, CAL:57 SN:643-04159
Claimant: Stephen Sanders and Rebecca Slayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Glock Inc. 30S Pistol CAL:45 SN: BFTL715 et al
as 4:2023cv12279
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Glock Inc. 30S Pistol CAL:45 SN: BFTL715, 13 Rounds Barnes Bullets Ammunition CAL: 45, GARAYSAR, INC. Unknown Shotgun CAL: Unknown SN:21T-008616 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $108,790.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2022cv02810
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $108,790.00 in United States Currency
Claimant: Adarious Jaquez Smith, M Cove Logistics LLC and Plug Brudaz Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Real Property Known as 204 Robert M. Green Drive, Frankfort, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00033
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Real Property Known as 204 Robert M. Green Drive, Frankfort, Kentucky and Ford VIN : 1FBSS3BL7BDA11508
Petitioner: Fei Guo Tang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Personal Property Semi-automatic S&W M&P Shield, Cal: 40, S/N: HVU2754 et al
as 2:2022cv10303
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Personal Property Semi-automatic S&W M&P Shield, Cal: 40, S/N: HVU2754, Personal Property Eight (8) rounds of .40 caliber ammunition and Personal Property Seven (7) rounds of .40 caliber ammunition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Personal Property SMITH & WESSON M&P 380 Pistol CAL:380 SN:KBV2134 et al
as 2:2021cv12592
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Personal Property SMITH & WESSON M&P 380 Pistol CAL:380 SN:KBV2134, Personal Property GLOCK INC. 19GEN5 Pistol CAL:9 SN:BNSP175 and Personal Property BUSHMASTER FIREARMS CBA Hunter Rifle CAL:450 SN: 610605062618
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Firearm Mossberg 500A Shotgun CAL:12 SN:R165442; et al
as 4:2021cv12086
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Firearm Mossberg 500A Shotgun CAL:12 SN:R165442;, Firearm Winchester 94 Rifle CAL:44-40 SN:3301994M;, Firearm Rossi M92 Rifle CAL:45 SN:MA016537; and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Firearm Ruger LCPII .380 Auto Caliber Pistol Serial No: 380162771 and Box Magazine et al
as 4:2021cv11130
Defendant: Sixty Eight .380 Auto Caliber Cartridges, Fourteen .40 Caliber Cartridges, Firearm Smith & Wesson M&P Shield .40 Caliber Pistol Serial No: HMM2252 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. One Hundred Sixty-Two Thousand, Eight Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars and 00/100 ($162,868.00) in United States Currency, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant: Browning, Model Light 12, 12-Gauge Shotgun, Serial No. G3 18188, 1966 Chevrolet Chevy II, VIN: 113116W156511, with All Attachments Thereon, One Hundred Sixty-Two Thousand, Eight Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars and 00/100 ($162,868.00) in United States Currency, et al. and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?