Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Martha Rodriguez Marrufo v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04488
Plaintiff:
Martha Rodriguez Marrufo
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Estate of Michael Frank Marrufo et al v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Frank Marrufo, Jennifer Marrufo, G.H. and others
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield, Jason Zamora Gonzalez and Carlos Hernandez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Marrufo
as 24-50206
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Martin Perez Marrufo, also known as Popeye, also known as 89
Medina et al v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs et al
as 1:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Florangelis Maria Cabreara Medina, Alexander Jose Vizcaino Marrufo, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Defendant:
New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs, Rapid Reliable Testing NY, LLC d/b/a DocGo, Deven Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Marrufo
as 23-1606
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC DAVID MARRUFO
Lerma Marrufo v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2023cv03110
Plaintiff:
Francisca Lerma Marrufo
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Wallace Carroll
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Miranda Robles v. Marrufo Dominguez
as 3:2023cv01143
Petitioner:
Laura Karina Miranda Robles
Respondent:
Ernie Christopher Marrufo Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007 Petition to compel attendance before arbitrator
Marrufo v. Harpe
as 5:2023cv00313
Petitioner:
Fabian Arturo Marrufo
Respondent:
Steve Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
USA v. Marrufo
as 22-50956
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Martin Perez Marrufo, also known as Popeye, also known as 89
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
