Cases 31 - 40 of 87
MOLINA v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2018cv01736
Plaintiff:
WALEIDMA MOLINA
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, MATTHEW DIEHL, CHRISTOPHER STEVENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. MAY et al
as 2:2018cv01447
Plaintiff:
SHAKREE BENNETT
Defendant:
GERALD MAY, BLANCHE CARNEY, JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00412
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lopez-Molina v. Lowe
as 1:2017cv02147
Petitioner:
Mario Lopez-Molina
Respondent:
Craig A. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VACEK v. AWAD et al
as 2:2017cv02820
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. VACEK, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE M. AWAD, DANIEL G. BELTZMAN, MICHAEL M. BHASKARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. WARRIOR ENERGY SERVICES CORP.
as 3:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL H. CLARK , JOSHUA M. NICHOLS , JOHN WARDEN and others
Defendant:
WARRIOR ENERGY SERVICES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MOLINA v. PERFECTION FOODS COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00859
Plaintiff:
SILVIA BARRIENTOS MOLINA
Defendant:
PERFECTION FOODS COMPANY, INC. , MAXIMUM LABOR INC. , HAHN TRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MOLINA v. CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2015cv02541
Plaintiff:
MARIA CRUZ MOLINA
Defendant:
CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY et al
as 2:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY, MICHAEL NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM PPS CFCF CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2014cv04973
Plaintiff:
SERGIO BENSON
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, K. BASHIR, MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
