Cases 41 - 50 of 64
SMITH v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2012cv00029
Defendant:
ZACHARIAH NATHAN ADAMS, NATHAN WAYNE BANET, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TONY L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manges v. Harman et al
as 3:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Timothy P Manges
Defendant:
Terry Harman , David Rogers , Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vermillion v. Plank et al
as 3:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vermillion
Defendant:
Willard Plank, Charles Whelan, Dawn Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Darryl Myers
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, Bret Mize, Chuck Penfold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIPPEY et al v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00044
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NATHAN WAYNE BANET, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CRYSTAL THOMPSON and JOHANNA RIPPEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROWE v. FINNAN et al
as 1:2011cv00524
Defendant:
LISA ASH, DANIEL BODLOVICH, EDWIN BUSS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Norington v. Daniels et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Norington
Defendant:
Mitchell E Daniels, Jr, Edwin G Buss, Attorney General of the State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Darryl Myers
Defendant:
Mark Levenhagen, Brett Mize, Chuck Penfold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norington v. Draper et al
as 3:2010cv00473
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Norington
Defendant:
H Draper, McNeil, Lauran Crohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb et al v. Praxair Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00388
Plaintiff:
Richard Cobb and Debra Cobb
Defendant:
Praxair Inc , Union Carbide Corp , Steven Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
