Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Rodriguez v. Noriega
as 0:2023cv03911
Petitioner:
Jesus Rafael Roman Rodriguez
Respondent:
Maria Luisa Sanchez Noriega
Howard v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-400
Plaintiff / Appellee:
REGINALD C. HOWARD
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE, DAVID DRUMMOND, JESSE COX and others
Defendant:
KERCHEN and MALLINGER
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Noriega et al
as 1:2023cv23821
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Mario Noriega and Ceviche Inka LLC doing business as Ceviche Inka Pisco Bar & Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Noriega et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv04617
Plaintiff:
Johnny Noriega and Maria Noriega
Defendant:
Aledandro Mayorkas, Director Kevin Riddle, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Jean Noriega
as 23-2208
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEAN NORIEGA, also known as Poison
USA v. Cesar Molina Munoz
as 23-50033
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CESAR ORENSO MOLINA MUNOZ, AKA Miguel Alcoba, AKA Cesar Castillo Munoz, AKA Kevin Estuardo Molina, AKA Cezar Orenso Molina Munoz, AKA Cesar Munoz, AKA Kevin Noriega
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00820
Plaintiff:
Meadors, Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Luis Noriega
as 21-50262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS RAMON NORIEGA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
