Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BROWN v. PATTERSON, et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
GREGORY G. BROWN
Defendant:
K. PATTERSON and T. PAULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rad et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv02263
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review/Board of Immigration Appeals, Jeffery Boyles, Roger Pauley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rad and Reynard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAULEY et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
OVERTON WAYNE PAULEY, ZACHARY T. KING, DAVID J. GOWER and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. , BOBBY L. MEEKS , HOWARD BARRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAULEY v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv03927
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. PAULEY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PAULEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59170
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER A. PAULEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ARMSTRONG et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2010cv01246
Plaintiff:
GALEN ARMSTRONG , TIM BARTHELMES , MATT BARTKO and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, NATHAN HARPER, PAUL DONALDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAULEY v. A C AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90134
Plaintiff:
DONALD W PAULEY and DONALD W PAULEY
Defendant:
A C AND S., INC., A C AND S., INC., A C AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PAULEY v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2007cv03429
Plaintiff:
FLOYD PAULEY
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Porte-Yanes v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 4:2007cv00017
Petitioner:
Jorge Porte-Yanes
Respondent:
Board of Immigration Appeals and Pauley Roger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
