Cases 1 - 10 of 53
LEE et al v. PENCE et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
BRIAN ABBOTT, CHRIS ATKINS, KEN COCHRAN and others
Plaintiff:
CANDACE BATTEN-LEE, PAMELA LEE, MARTHA LEVERETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R. V. VEACH and THREE UNKNOWN CORRECTIONNAL OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACK BEAUTY COAL COMPANY, LLC v. SCHMIDT
as 3:2008cv00172
Plaintiff:
BLACK BEAUTY COAL COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
R. V. SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HUGHES v. KRAEMER et al
as 2:2008cv00417
Plaintiff:
ROY TYRONE HUGHES
Defendant:
STAN KRAEMER, R V VEACH, HELEN MARBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STEPHENS v. VEACH et al
as 2:2008cv00160
Petitioner:
THOMAS LEE STEPHENS
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH and HELEN MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ELEM v. VEACH et al
as 2:2008cv00162
Petitioner:
JOHNELL ELEM
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH and HELEN MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
METCALF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD METCALF
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL ATWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENAWALT v. VEACH et al
as 2:2008cv00072
Petitioner:
JAMES GREENAWALT
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GROSS v. VEACH et al
as 2:2008cv00043
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH and B. R. JETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WEBSTER v. WATTS et al
as 2:2008cv00013
Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER
Defendant:
HERRE WATTS, MICHAEL K NALLEY, R. V. VEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
