Cases 1 - 10 of 10,290
SAGAR v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04218
Plaintiff:
KUNDA SAGAR
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. and ALEXANDRA RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Gomez (Ramos-Acevedo)
as 24-1336
Defendant:
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ, RAMON RAMOS-ACEVEDO, Calami and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramos Cano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3211
Petitioner:
ANA LETICIA RAMOS CANO, ARELI HERRERA RAMOS and JUAN HERRERA RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Mario Ramos et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Mario Ramos and Steve Ramos
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Ramos-Benitez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3123
Petitioner:
BERANICE GRISELDA RAMOS-BENITEZ and DAYRON NOE SANCHEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz et al v. Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
as 1:2024cv01969
Plaintiff:
Genesis Ruiz, Nohemy Arriola, Odilia Arriola and others
Defendant:
Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eli Ramos v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 5:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
Eli Ramos
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Murillo-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3109
Petitioner:
MIGUEL MURILLO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
