Cases 1 - 10 of 261
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo
Defendant:
U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. USA
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeremy Damon Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ross v. USA
as 5:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Henry Lamar Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Ross v. Risperdaul
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ryan Clark Ross
Defendant:
Risperdaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Officer Henry Adams, Doctor Farly Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ross Massey
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francois v. Salazar et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jamal Francois
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazard, DA Joe Gonzalez, Ron Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy Smith, Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
