Cases 1 - 10 of 86
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ROWLANDS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 2:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROWLANDS
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SERAFIN et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv01538
Plaintiff:
KAYLEIGH SERAFIN and CARA ROWLAND
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
ROWLAND v. BISSELL HOMECARE, INC.
as 2:2022cv01500
Plaintiff:
CARA ROWLAND
Defendant:
BISSELL HOMECARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ROWLAND v. HELEN OF TROY LTD.
as 2:2022cv01495
Defendant:
HELEN OF TROY LTD. also known as HELEN OF TROY L.P. doing business as HOT TOOLS PROFESSIONAL and HELEN OF TROY L.P.
Plaintiff:
CARA ROWLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Property Damage
PALM v. BELL et al
as 2:2022cv01165
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. PALM
Defendant:
RASHEED BELL, DAVID ROWLAND, SHARON BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
WATERMAN v. SPX FLOW, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
SPX FLOW, INC., ROBERT HULL, MAJDI ABULABAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
ROWLAND v. PISTRO et al
as 2:2021cv04466
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ROWLAND
Defendant:
KEVIN D. PISTRO, CAPTAIN ROOT, LT. SHANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
