Cases 1 - 10 of 12,924
COLEY v. WOZNIAK et al
as 2:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. COLEY
Defendant:
JOSHUA WOZNIAK, CORTY SMITH and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMITH v. STRUBINGER et al
as 2:2024cv01655
Plaintiff:
ALISHA SMITH and ALISHA SHEPARD-SMITH
Defendant:
SERGEANT GEOFFREY STRUBINGER, DETECTIVE THOMAS D'ALESIO, NORMA PELUYERA-ALAMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SMITH v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
ALPHEAUS SMITH
Defendant:
SAMANTHA THOMPSON and NOAH SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Pocono Township Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown
Defendant:
Pocono Township Police Department, Office Thomas Moser, Corporal Douglas Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMITH v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
ERIC SMITH
Defendant:
WELLPATH, DR. ANNINO, DR. LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH et al v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02558
Plaintiff:
TAMI SMITH and EDWARD SKIBINSKI
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC. and THE LASH GROUP, LLC
JACKSON v. SIPPLE et al
as 2:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
DEP. MANDY SIPPLE, UM. FANRAK, LT. CUNNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACKER et al v. UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
as 2:2024cv02468
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ACKER, MICHAEL AMENDOLA, AIDEN ANKLI and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
