Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Schumacher v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00852
Plaintiff:
Sarah Schumacher
Defendant:
ANDREW M SAUL and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Thiess v. City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv02261
Plaintiff:
Derek A. Thiess
Defendant:
City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Moncia Duran, Janice Hoppe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Schumacher v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Sherry L Schumacher
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company v. Schumacher Electric Corporation
as 1:2012cv01317
Plaintiff:
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Defendant:
Schumacher Electric Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
John Morgan , Dustin Cook , Paul Stark and others
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Jeffrey Wells, Jim Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schumacher v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00973
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Schumacher
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Katz v. Gerardi et al
as 1:2009cv01340
Plaintiff:
Jack P. Katz, Jack P. Katz, Jack P. Katz and others
Defendant:
Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr., Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr., Ernest A. Gerardi, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schumacher v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv01348
Petitioner:
Jimmie Ray Schumacher, Jr.
Respondent:
Joe Ortiz and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
