Cases 41 - 50 of 915
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Spade v. Sharp
as 1:2024cv00866
Petitioner:
Daniel William Spade
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Argiri v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Lauren Argiri
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zuggi v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Kristine Zuggi
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guzman v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lynne Guzman
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berry v. Sharp
as 5:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Brandon J Berry
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharpe v. Bircher
as 7:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sharpe
Defendant:
John C. Bircher, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sharp v. Anderson, The City of et al
as 8:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Brent Sharp
Defendant:
Anderson, The City of, Anderson Police Department, Shelby Millington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Weiss v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lyndzee Weiss
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harnocz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Harnocz
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.