Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Ames v. Sharp
as 5:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Former Officer James Sharp, Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Parole Officer Emily Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. City of Springfield, Missouri et al
as 6:2023cv03269
Plaintiff:
Edward C Sharp
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Missouri and Springfield Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. USA
as 6:2023cv03212
Petitioner:
Curtis Sharp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sharp v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Alan Kent Sharp
Defendant:
Kevin Bell, Timothy Macomas and Melissa Sisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Sharp v. United States
as 23-1365
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Carl Sharp
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Carmichael v. Wofford et al
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Carmichael
Defendant:
Stephanie Wofford, Duane Bugsby, Mississippi County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Sharp County Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard Thornton
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Center and Edith Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Sharp v. United States
as 22-3574
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Carl Sharp
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Anthony Sharp v. SD Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 22-2762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Keenan Sharp
Defendant / Appellee:
South Dakota Department of Corrections, official capacity, Rebecca Schieffer, Assistant Deputy Warden, individual capacity, Cynthia Skelton-Brown, Correctional Unit Coordinator, individual capacity and others
Sharpe v. Higdon et al
as 5:2022cv05073
Plaintiff:
Germane Andre Sharpe
Defendant:
Andrew Higdon and John Threet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
