Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Tapscott v. United States
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Shirley Tapscott
Defendant:
Steven Gray, Matt Norfleet, Mary Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 oc Notice of Removal - Other Contract
Bazemore v. Papa John's USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bazemore, Colin Sharp, Connor Schultz and others
Defendant:
Papa John's USA, Inc. and Papa John's International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ford v. Moody et al
as 5:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Sean Ford
Defendant:
Curtis Moody and Sharp Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Clarke et al v. Duke et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Rossana Clarke, Jessica Wollaston and Paula Kennedy
Defendant:
Deputy Jacob Duke, Lieutenant Taylor Miller, Trooper Matthew Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sharp v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2021cv00072
Petitioner:
Meiesha R. Sharp
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Sharp v. McElfresh
as 4:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Sharp
Defendant:
Megan McElfresh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Louisville Metro Housing Authority
as 3:2019cv00400
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sharp
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00600
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fairfield v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ruth Fairfield
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
