Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Raoul
as 3:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sherman
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JAMES v. I.D.O.C. MEDICAL et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
ZECHARIAH B. JAMES
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. MEDICAL, MENTAL HEALTH STAFF DEPARTMENT, MEDICAL COMPANY P.C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scullark v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv03489
Plaintiff:
Sherman Scullark
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, Matthew Scarbrough, J Stahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hunt
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Travoy Johnson
Defendant:
Sherman Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chadrick Fulks v. T. Watson, et al
as 22-3308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADRICK FULKS
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM WILSON, Doctor, LIEUTENANT SHERMAN and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sherman L. Fields v. John Gilley
as 22-2762
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHERMAN L. FIELDS
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE KALLIS, Warden and JOHN GILLEY
EMERSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv01482
Petitioner:
SHERMAN EMERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
