Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Russell et al v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv05001
Plaintiff:
Tommy Russell and Debby Valdes Russell
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc., Kevin C. Sims and Out West Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Native American Faith Group of the Nebraska State Penitentiary, et al v. Frakes, et al
as 8:2016cv00326
Defendant:
Randy Bartelt, Richard Cruickshank, Scott R. Frakes and others
Plaintiff:
Native American Faith Group of the Nebraska State Penitentiary and Michael Joseph Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sexton et al v. Kenney et al
as 8:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Carla Arndt, Britteney Baker, Frances Beaver and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Bicknase, Brooke Bjerrum, Jeanne Goliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Randall et al
as 4:2012cv03074
Defendant:
Jon Bruning, Don Kleine, George R. Love and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. First Data Technologies, Inc.
as 8:2012cv00029
Defendant:
First Data Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Sims, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Turrentine-Sims v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2011cv00194
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Dinah Turrentine-Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Houston et al
as 4:2007cv03088
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Sims
Respondent:
Robert Houston and Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. University Medical Center et al
as 4:2007cv03012
Plaintiff:
Eric Fritzgerald Lewis
Defendant:
University Medical Center, Renasonce Magnetic Images, Omaha Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
