Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Katrina Lizbeth Sims
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sims v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Shawn Andrea Sims
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01237
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McLemore et al v. Gumucio et al
as 3:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Will McLemore, McLemore Auction Company, LLC, Ron Brajkovich and others
Defendant:
Roxana Gumucio, Assistant Director of the Tennessee Auctioneer Commission, Kimball Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims, Jr. v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00992
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sims v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sims
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sims v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Lovie Nicole Sims
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Truth in Lending
Anderson et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
