Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gilliam v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al
as 7:2023cv06144
Plaintiff:
James W. Gilliam, LLB
Defendant:
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, Esq. and Toby S. Soli, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Urban Pathways, Inc., Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kirby v. Hanks et al
as 5:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
David L. Kirby, III
Defendant:
B. Hanks, J. Harriman and R. Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04267
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Battle
Defendant:
Police Officer Solis Lukasz, Nicholas Velotti and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06510
Defendant:
The New York State Office of Court Administration, Urban Pathways Inc., Frederick Shack and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Muhammadali v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01521
Defendant:
P.O. Solis, Sgt. Cordiner, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Sayyid D. Muhammadali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv09175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Solis v. Edgewood Park Estates Inc.
as 6:2015cv06634
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Solis
Defendant:
Edgewood Park Estates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
