Cases 1 - 10 of 2,109
Robbins v. Dept of Corr et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Steven J Robbins and Steven Joseph Robbins
Defendant:
Dept of Corr, Jerry Preshon, Thomas Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Barry
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Christina Reagle, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thomas, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gentle Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Loza et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Dontrell S Rice
Defendant:
Marcos Loza, Kylie M Holcomb, Thomas Alevizos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Barry
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Christina Reagle, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. GOFFINET et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
LUCY GOFFINET and T. PARKER HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GISLER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW THOMAS GISLER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
