Cases 1 - 10 of 1,269
Neifert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas Neifert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peterson v. Subit et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David W Peterson
Defendant:
Michael C Subit and Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
George v. Jursek et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
Colville Confederated Tribes, Alice Koskela, Shannon Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Burke v. Nowels et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burke
Defendant:
John T Nowels, State of Washington Attorney General and Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentine v. Green Diamond Resource Company
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Thomas Valentine
Defendant:
Green Diamond Resource Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Thomas v. Instant Brands LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05232
Plaintiff:
Brandon B Thomas and Brandon Barrington Thomas
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, INC., Corelle Brands LLC, Instant Brands, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stockton et al v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
John Stockton, Richard Eggleston, Thomas T Siler and others
Defendant:
Robert Ferguson, Kyle S Karinen and John and Jane Does MDs 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas v. Bankers Life Securities Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05306
Plaintiff:
Denise Thomas
Defendant:
Bankers Life Securities Inc and Bankers Life Advisory Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hipp v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Zachary Thomas Hipp
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
