Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Clark v. Howe et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brodie Lee Doyle Clark
Defendant:
Kyle Howe, City of Toledo, Iowa, Brandon Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
McSweeney v. Howe et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McSweeney
Defendant:
Kyle Howe, City of Toledo, Iowa, Anthony Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Horrigan v. Howe et al
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Steven Horrigan
Defendant:
Kyle Howe and City of Toledo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Wolf v. Howe et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Shyla Wolf
Defendant:
Kyle Howe, City of Toledo and City of Toledo, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Leonard v. Howe et al
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Lang Leonard
Defendant:
Kyle Howe and City of Toledo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
United States v. Ruben Toledo, Jr.
as 23-2677
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ruben Toledo, Jr.
Toledo-Renteria v. United State of America
as 4:2022cv00239
Petitioner:
Netzahualcoyotyl Toledo-Renteria
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Renteria
as 1:2022cv00009
Defendant:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Netzahualcoyotl Toledo Renteria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
