Cases 1 - 10 of 584
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Bloomfield, Jalisa X. Cuevas, Matthew T. Suplee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Frischling v. Radford et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Steven Frischling
Defendant:
David Radford, II, Albert Gosselin, III and Town of Montville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Razz-Wellington et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Young
Defendant:
Jenna Razz-Wellington, Dimitar Sadiev, Richard Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Bloomfield, Jalisa X. Cuevas, Matthew T. Suplee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. Town of Naugatuck et al
as 3:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Jarell Day
Defendant:
Town of Naugatuck, Officer Nicholas D. Kehoss and Nicholas D. Kehoss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Orane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Bloomfield, Kelsey Marschall, Lebreck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mccullough v. Town of Rocky Hill
as 3:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. McCullough
Defendant:
Town of Rocky Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
