Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Stubbs #304356 v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs #304356
Defendant:
Michael Brown and Rachael Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Sean Valle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Valles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
David Valles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hemingway v. SP 48 Freight Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Susanne G. Hemingway
Defendant:
SP 48 Freight Inc., The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Amarilis A. Tomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Valle v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Juan Valle
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Michael Klinger and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Oscar Morales-Ortiz, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3207
Petitioner:
OSCAR MIGUEL MORALES-ORTIZ, ADRIANITA ELIZABETH GALDAMES-DEL VALLE, ESVIN GALDAMES-DEL VALLE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Deloach #182521 v. Valle
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Mark Deloach #182521
Defendant:
Rachael Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Luis Godoy-Valles
as 21-5946
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS ALONZO GODOY-VALLES, aka Seferino Mateo-Barrios, aka Angel Perez, aka Ricardo Enrique Valle, aka Dario Nino Vasquez
Valle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01714
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julio Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
