Cases 41 - 50 of 373
PERFUMES 4 U LAS VEGAS, INC. et al v. RAWLS
as 2:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
PERFUMES 4 U LAS VEGAS, INC., Ron A Friedman, PERFUMES 4 U LAS VEGAS, INC. doing business as PERFUMES 4 U and others
Defendant:
Robin Rawls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
PERFUMES 4 U LAS VEGAS, INC. et al v. Rawls
as 2:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
PERFUMES 4 U LAS VEGAS, INC. and Ron A Friedman
Defendant:
Robin Rawls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrea Pacheco Vega v. Attorney General United States
as 21-3268
Petitioner:
ANDREA PAOLA PACHECO VEGA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vega v. Ontrak, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01701
Plaintiff:
Maxx Vega
Defendant:
Terren S. Peizer, Brandon H. LaVerne, Curtis Medeiros and others
Nominal Defendant:
Ontrak, Inc.
Tremayne Durham v. G. Kelley, et al
as 21-3187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O.R. G. KELLEY, C.O.R. B. CORREA, C.O.R. W. GRAY and others
Defendant:
C.O.R. M. DOYLE, C.O.R. MOBOLANLE EBO, C.O.R. Z. GOODWIN and others
VEGA v. WEISS
as 2:2021cv05157
Petitioner:
JAZMIN S. VEGA
Respondent:
SCOTT WEISS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DINOIA v. REALTY EXECUTIVES et al
as 2:2021cv20011
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. DINOIA
Defendant:
REALTY EXECUTIVES, JHON RIOS, CHRISTIAN VEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEGA-PABON v. CONNELL et al
as 5:2021cv04802
Plaintiff:
BERTO VEGA-PABON
Defendant:
JAMES CONNELL, NARIA DILUZIO and NURIA DILUZIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Letter Request from Mexico
as 1:2021mc00429
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Family Matters Court of the Judicial District of Cholula in Puebla, Mexico and Jose Angel Zechinelli Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
