Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Jaber v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Faquzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber
Defendant:
W. Rodriguez, A. Christian, FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jaber v. Rodriguez
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
W Rodriguez and W. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jaber v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber
Defendant:
W. Rodriguez, Salem Warden, A. Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cordoba v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cordoba
Defendant:
Correction Officer A. Rodriguez, Correction Officer K. Barnes, Correction Officer L. Maldalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul-Menhem Jaber v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Faquzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber and Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
United States of America, FNU Salem, W Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Joseph Andrew Perez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv08643
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Perez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva, Bobby Wynche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Touhami
as 22-40695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank W. Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Mohamad Touhami, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Rodriguez v. Hanson
as 22-40407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank W. Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Janice Hanson
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38093
Plaintiff:
JASON W RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Roberto Rodriguez
as 21-5655
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO W. RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
