Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WENTZ v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
as 2:2020cv01853
Defendant:
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., PORTER-CABLE CORPORATION, BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. trading and doing business as PORTER- CABLE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. WENTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. WENTZ
as 2:2019cv04158
Defendant:
TOWNSEND WENTZ
Plaintiff:
THEODORE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WENTZ v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2016cv04590
Plaintiff:
EDWARD WENTZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GREEN v. FARDARKO et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
JAIME FARDARKO, JOHN HAGERTY, RAYMOND BURKHARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wentz v. Morgan Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01572
Plaintiff:
Laura C. Wentz
Defendant:
Morgan Corporation, Norbert Markert and Steve Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rhoades v. York County Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv01445
Plaintiff:
Jason Rhoades
Defendant:
York County Police Department and William Wentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trout et al v. Wentz et al
as 1:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
Marlyn Trout and Jordin Trout
Defendant:
William Wentz, Karen Comery, Officer Hivner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
