Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Bennett v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06653
Defendant:
Police Officer Reid Astrida, P. Barnes, Mayor Bill Blasio and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ying Lu, et al v. Mark Lezell, et al
as 15-7028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ying Qing Lu, "Lucy", Oklahoma Shelf Exploration And Development, LLC, (OSED) and Afshin Afsharnia
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bridges Financial, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Lloyd Lezell and Isam Ghosh
Moses v. Dookhan et al
as 1:2013cv11632
Plaintiff:
Todd Moses
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, Della Saunders, Xiu Ying Gao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Hahn
as 12-2289
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. HAHN, a/k/a Xue Ying Hu a/k/a Chin-Su Hahn
Ogo, et al v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
J. Ogo, R. Haenggi, R. T. Scott and others
Defendant:
Rojo, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Traquina et al
as 2:2008cv02413
Plaintiff:
Elza Pittman
Defendant:
Alvaro C. Traquina, Troy Brimhall, Joel Popson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huang v. Myers et al
as 1:2008cv00538
Petitioner:
Zeng Ying Huang
Respondent:
Julie L. Myers and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
