Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cornejo v. Minglana et al
as 4:2023cv05383
Plaintiff:
Efrain Cornejo
Defendant:
Sergeant V. Minglana, T. Clayton, C.H. Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urmancheev v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv01039
Plaintiff:
A.S. Urmancheev
Defendant:
United States, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Urmancheev v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Health Services Corps et al
as 3:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
A.S. Urmancheev
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Health Services Corps and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
(PC) Lamon v. Mey et al
as 2:2020cv01474
Defendant:
A.E. Spearman, Grether, Roderick and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2018cv02278
Defendant:
Sergeant Q. Jackson, Durant, A.S. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Allan Venson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Coleman v. Frauenheim et al
as 1:2017cv01276
Defendant:
Scott Frauenheim, Mike Rainwater, Scott Kernan and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart Manago v. Walsh et al
as 1:2013cv01848
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
W. Walsh, A. Joaquin, R. Moustafa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2011cv01310
Plaintiff:
Jules Buckley
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison and A.E. Ritola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2010cv02474
Plaintiff:
Jules Buckley
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison and A.E. Ritola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 4:2010cv03808
Plaintiff:
Jules Buckley
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison and A.E. Ritola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
