Cases 1 - 10 of 5,621
LEUTHE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEUTHE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
SHAW v. MARKS et al
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
ARIES SHAW
Defendant:
AARON M. MARKS, JOEY D BRANT, CORPORAL MARIACHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
LEUTHE v. BUBASH
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
CATHLEEN BUBASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH et al
as 5:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
EDWIN GEORGE PFURSICH, IV and CODY PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARMON v. ATLAS FLASHER & SUPPLY CO, INC
as 2:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
AARON HARMON
Defendant:
ATLAS FLASHER & SUPPLY CO, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MAXA v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
AARON MAXA
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Su v. CORABIA HOME HEALTH CARE LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01733
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
CORABIA HOME HEALTH CARE LLC, AARON CHANDRAN and MARY CASTILLO HOLGUIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
COLLINS v. CARA et al
as 2:2024cv00579
Petitioner:
AARON L. COLLINS
Respondent:
KEVIN C. CARA, LOUIS J. MCQUILLAN and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNYSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
