Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Abdul-Malik v. Vasto et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Ryan Abdul-Malik
Defendant:
Nicholas Vasto and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taing v. Bar at 66 Greenpoint LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06681
Plaintiff:
Vandy Taing
Defendant:
Bar at 66 Greenpoint LLC and Ibraheem Abdul-Malik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Abdul-Malik v. Office of Court Administration et al
as 1:2018cv07361
Defendant:
Sherrill Spatz, Unified Court System for the 11th Judicial District, Francis Kenna, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Salim Abdul-Malik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00215
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diggs v. Robertson et al
as 1:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Andre Diggs
Defendant:
Robertson, Abdul-Malik, Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hussain v. Arshad et al
as 1:2015cv03688
Defendant:
Shafqat Hussain Arshad, Zafar Imran, Abdul Malik and others
Plaintiff:
Mumtaz Hussain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hussain v. Yaqub et al
as 1:2015cv02261
Defendant:
Bashir, Imran, Joj and others
Plaintiff:
Mumtaz Hussain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Savings Plan v. Little et al
as 1:2013cv06281
Defendant:
Christopher Jackson and Abdul Malik Little
Plaintiff:
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Savings Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Little et al
as 1:2013cv01059
Defendant:
Christopher Jackson and Abdul Malik Little
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Malik v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06062
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik
Defendant:
City of New York, Dept of Corrections NYC Corporation Counsel, Rose Agro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
