Cases 1 - 10 of 49
McDowell v. City of St. Petersburg et al
as 8:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Rondale McDowell
Defendant:
City of St. Petersburg, ABM Security Services, G4S Secure Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Local 25 S.E.I.U. Welfare Fund et al v. Universal Protection Service, LLC, d/b/a Allied Universal Security Services, formerly d/b/a ABM Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01958
Plaintiff:
Local 25 S.E.I.U. Welfare Fund and Local 25 S.E.I.U. & Participating Employers Pension Trust
Defendant:
ABM Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
ST. HUBERT v. ABM SECURITY SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2017cv22449
Plaintiff:
MARIE ST. HUBERT
Defendant:
ABM SECURITY SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Local 25 S.E.I.U. Welfare Fund et al v. ABM Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01719
Plaintiff:
Local 25 S.E.I.U. Welfare Fund and Local 25 S.E.I.U. & Participating Employers Pension Trust
Defendant:
ABM Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vardan Karapetyan v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv08313
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated, ABM Security Services Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Vardan Karapetyan
Joseph v. ABM Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv23917
Plaintiff:
Raymond Joseph
Defendant:
ABM Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
