Cases 41 - 50 of 127
COLLINS v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03250
Plaintiff:
JOANN COLLINS
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and SUPER VALUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Brien v. Acme Markets Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09887
Defendant:
Acme Markets Inc. , Albertsons Companies Inc. , Albertsons Companies, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Ann O'Brien
Cross_defendant:
Acme Markets Inc. , Albertsons Companies Inc. , Albertsons Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swartz v. Acme Markets, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03911
Plaintiff:
Eric Swartz
Defendant:
Acme Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPEER v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv06791
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE SPEER
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC., ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., BAYSHORE MALL 1A, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PELIKOSKI et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv05130
Plaintiff:
NANCY PELIKOSKI and ROBERT PELIKOSKI
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , ALBERTSONS COMPANIES and JOHN DOE RESPONSIBLE PARTY(S)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAPENT et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2016cv03673
Plaintiff:
JOANNE G. LAPENT and JOSEPH LAPENT
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PODURGIEL v. ACME MARKETS INC.
as 3:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PODURGIEL
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BERROCAL et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2016cv01797
Plaintiff:
ALBILDA BERROCAL and LUIS BERROCAL
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MORRISSEY v. ACME MARKETS, INC et al
as 1:2016cv01658
Plaintiff:
DEBRA MORRISSEY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC , JOHN DOE, INC. and JOHN ROE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
