Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Bulluck v. USA
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Christopher Bulluck
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harden v. Clearwater Key Association Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jon B. Harden
Defendant:
Clearwater Key Association Inc., David Hinderliter, Gwynda L. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
United States v. Adam Evans
as 23-3498
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Adam Christopher Evans
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12895
Plaintiff:
ADAM CHRISTOPHER FISHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horty v. USA
as 2:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Adam Christopher Horty
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAIGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21495
Plaintiff:
ADAM CHRISTOPHER DAIGLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norman v. McKinney et al
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Willie A Norman and Willie A Norman, Jr
Defendant:
Jennifer J McKinney, Shane Harbert, Abbegale Yvonne Saal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuspa v. McKinney et al
as 3:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Adam Christopher Kuspa, Sr
Defendant:
Jennifer J McKinney, Mario G Cavorro, Andrew Timmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuspa v. Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Adam Christopher Kuspa, Sr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Collard v. USA
as 22-2059
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM CHRISTOPHER COLLARD and JOSEPH ALAN COLLARD
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
