Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lang v. Clinton
as 25-126
Plaintiff:
JASON WILLIAM LANG
Defendant:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, ANDREW M. CUOMO, BARACK OBAMA and others
Lang v. Clinton et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jason William Lang
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Barack Hussein Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandler v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv21083
Plaintiff:
Adam Sandler
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Soria v. Sandler
as 6:2016cv00203
Defendant:
Adams Sandler
Plaintiff:
Peter Alexander Soria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marina Bar v. Adam Sandler et al
as 2:2012cv01667
Plaintiff:
Marina Bar
Defendant:
Columbia Pictures Industries Inc, Does, Happy Madison Production Inc and others
Cabell v. Sony Entertainment, Inc.
as 10-2690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert W. Cabell
Defendant - Appellee:
Sony Entertainment, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Pulse Advertising, Inc. and others
Cabell v. Sony Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01610
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Cabell
Defendant:
Sony Entertainment, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Pulse Advertising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Northwind Resources, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv05631
Plaintiff:
Dan Parker
Defendant:
Northwind Resources, LLC, Adam Sandler, Dan Gould and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Sandler et al
as 3:2008cv00598
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Adam Sandler and Rob Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
