Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adamson v. Clarke
as 3:2021cv00617
Plaintiff:
Alvin Adamson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrusco v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Fred Carrusco
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Ochieng et al
as 2:2018cv00325
Plaintiff:
Travis McClinton Lewis
Defendant:
F. Ochieng, Medical Department, ADC Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Mcadams et al
as 2:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Battle
Defendant:
Lowell Mcadams, Henry Adamson, Tishaun Ophelia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Adamson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Adamson v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
as 3:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
V. Cassel Adamson, III
Defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Counter_defendant:
V. Cassel Adamson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Adamson v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, et al.
as 3:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
V. Cassel Adamson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth Gas Transmission, LLC and Cedrick L. Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company v. Adamson
as 3:2009cv00817
Plaintiff:
Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company and Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
V. Cassel Adamson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Riggan et al
as 3:2008cv00476
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Wilson B. Riggan, Jr., Jesse E. Riggan, V. Cassel Adamson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
