Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Archer-Daniels-Midland Compan, et al v. Regis Paillardon
as 13-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY and ADM LATIN AMERICA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIS PAILLARDON
Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. ADM Milling Company et al
as 2:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Defendant:
ADM Milling Company , Kris Lutt , Joe Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Askra Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland
as 2:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Askra Maritime Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland and ADM International SARL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Archer Daniels Midland Company et al v. Paillardon
as 2:2012cv02227
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company and ADM Latin America Inc
Defendant:
Regis Paillardon
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Paillardon v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2012cv22693
Petitioner:
Regis Paillardon
Respondent:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and ADM Latin America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
In re Subpoenas Issued to Jeffrey S. Ginsberg and R. Scott Roe
as 1:2011mc00397
Movant:
ADM21 Co., Ltd. and ADM Co. (North America) Ltd.
Defendant:
ADM USA
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
ADM Investor Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03266
Plaintiff:
ADM Investor Services, Inc.
Respondent:
Fluxo-Cane Overseas, Ltd. and Manoel Fernando Garcia
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Craker v. Drug Enforcement Administratio
as 09-1220
Petitioner:
LYLE E. CRAKER
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADM
:
Johnson v. Forfeiture Counsel Drug Enforcement Adm.
as 1:2008cv02422
Plaintiff:
Andre Johnson
Defendant:
Forfeiture Counsel Drug Enforcement Adm.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Muhammad v. Forfeiture Counsel Drug Enforcement Adm.
as 1:2008cv02122
Petitioner:
Ali Sadeeg Muhammad
Defendant:
Forfeiture Counsel Drug Enforcement Adm.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
