Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NAN v. MILGRAM et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
CUNSHENG NAN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR ANNE MILGRAM, PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ADM GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHA ORTIZ CHERYL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYDON v. MALHI et al
as 3:2015cv01425
Plaintiff:
MYONG C. BRYDON
Defendant:
SURINDER MALHI , KHUSHPAL MALHI , ADM LOGISTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FECSO v. DARBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv07129
Plaintiff:
DEBRA FECSO
Defendant:
DARBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC , GOURMET DINING, LLC , BAM MANAGEMENT AT MONMOUTH PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEATTY v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2013cv03089
Plaintiff:
STEFON BEATTY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, ADM. C RAY HUGHES, OFFICER REEVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADM 21 CO., LTD. et al v. ROBERT BOSCH GMBH et al
as 2:2011cv02015
Plaintiff:
ADM 21 CO., LTD. and ADM 21 COMPANY (NORTH AMERICA), LTD.
Defendant:
ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Counter_claimant:
ROBERT BOSCH LLC and ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Counter_defendant:
ADM 21 CO., LTD. and ADM 21 COMPANY (NORTH AMERICA), LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
KEITA v. TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL ADM
as 3:2010cv04557
Plaintiff:
BLAMA KEITA
Defendant:
TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL ADM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHETT v. FIREMANS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al
as 2:2009cv02727
Plaintiff:
ERIC J RHETT
Defendant:
FIREMANS INSURANCE COMPANY, HCCSE UNIT, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS CO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
