Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CASTRO-MOTA v. BENSALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01697
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
BENSALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER GANSKY, POLICE OFFICER BIEICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADORNO v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jose Adorno
Defendant:
VisionQuest National LTD and VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Withdrawal of Reference
ADORNO v. HANDS FROM THE HEART HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC et al
as 5:2021cv05463
Plaintiff:
MILAGROS ADORNO
Defendant:
HANDS FROM THE HEART HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, SAIRA HAIRSTON and TIFFANY WATERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LEHIGH COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS v. ADORNO
as 5:2018cv02546
Plaintiff:
LEHIGH COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS
Defendant:
RICARDO ADORNO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PALMER v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv02632
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PALMER
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , ADORNO , SCHWARTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADORNO v. COLVIN
as 3:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
SHARON M. ADORNO
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ADORNO v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv04269
Plaintiff:
ERIDALIA ADORNO
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ADORNO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv02132
Plaintiff:
MARIO ADORNO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adorno v. Commecial Recovery Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00544
Plaintiff:
Antonio Adorno
Defendant:
Commecial Recovery Systems, Inc., Tim Ford and David Devaney
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ADORNO v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv36466
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO A ADORNO
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
