Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Matthew Denholm v. ADT, LLC
as 22-6116
Not Yet Classified:
MATTHEW T. DENHOLM, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and ADT, LLC
Matthew Denholm v. ADT, LLC
as 22-6115
Not Yet Classified:
MATTHEW T. DENHOLM, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and ADT, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Armenia Ingram v. ADT, LLC
as 22-5042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENIA INGRAM, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
ADT, LLC
Ingram v. ADT LLC (PLR2)
as 3:2020cv00376
Plaintiff:
Armenia Ingram
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL-CIO, Local Union 369 v. ADT, LLC
as 3:2019cv00430
Respondent:
ADT, LLC
Petitioner:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL-CIO, Local Union 369 and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 369
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
McKee v. ADT, LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services
as 2:2017cv02710
Plaintiff:
Donald McKee
Defendant:
ADT, LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bernard v. ADS Security L.P. et al
as 5:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Judy Bernard
Defendant:
ADS Security L.P. and ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Farris v. ADT LLC
as 1:2017cv00820
Plaintiff:
Louis N. Farris, Jr.
Defendant:
ADT LLC and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
