Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Ferdman v. Advance Publications, Inc.,
as 1:2017cv06679
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Steven Ferdman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mustard v. Advance Publications, Inc.
as 1:2017cv08655
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mustard
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Thomas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06079
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc., Officer Allison Casanovas, Maura Grunland and others
Plaintiff:
Monique Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDermott v. Advance Publications, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05475
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Stelzer v. Advance Publications, Inc.
as 1:2017cv04267
Plaintiff:
Brigitte Stelzer
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Goldman v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09031
Plaintiff:
Justin Goldman
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc., Advance Digital and Advance Local
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Demos v. Gannett Corp Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00914
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Gannett Corp Inc., McClatchy Co, New York Times Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartonfalls LLC v. Advance Publications, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01134
Plaintiff:
Bartonfalls LLC
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Racusin et al v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv02730
Plaintiff:
Philip Racusin and Amanda Racusin
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc. , W.P. Productions, Inc. and National Product Reconditioning a/k/a NPR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
