Cases 1 - 10 of 10
AGC Flat Glass North America, Inc. v. John et al
as 2:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
AGC Flat Glass North America, Inc. doing business as AGC Automotive Americas Co.
Defendant:
Mwita John, Geofrey Mgaya, Jema Machines Automation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Cooper v. AFG Industries, Inc. dba AGC Automotive Americas - BF
as 2:2019cv04630
Plaintiff:
Vicki L Cooper
Defendant:
AFG Industries, Inc. dba AGC Automotive Americas - BF
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gilmore et al v. Aerotek Automotive et al
as 2:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Gilmore and Erica Gilmore
Defendant:
Aerotek Automotive and AGC Automotive Alabama, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
