Cases 1 - 10 of 991
Aguilar v. Hallings et al
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Tito Barron Aguilar
Defendant:
C/O Hallings, C/O Sergent William Tate, C/O Senior Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benigno Perez-Aguilar v. Jeff Howard
as 24-1340
Petitioner:
BENIGNO PEREZ-AGUILAR
Respondent:
JEFF HOWARD, Warden
Aguilar #118162 v. Petrova et al
as 2:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Benito Aguilar
Defendant:
Ralitsa Petrova, Unknown Kick, Unknown Bello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar #118162 v. Bates
as 2:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Benito Aguilar
Defendant:
Richard Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Barthuly et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Harold Eugene Hayes
Defendant:
Brad Barthuly, Devin Nielsen, Alysta Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar #118162 v. Ramos et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Benito Aguilar
Defendant:
Albert Ramos and Gaughan Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving Aguilar-Calixto v. Thomas Tyler
as 8:2024cv00596
Petitioner:
Irving Aguilar-Calixto
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
