Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03828
Plaintiff:
LANCASTER HOSPITAL CORPORATION doing business as PALMDALE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER also known as LANCASTER HOSPITAL, HRI HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as HRI HOSPITAL also known as HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE, UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. doing business as SOUTHERN CRESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM also known as ANCHOR HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER et al v. ALEX M. AZAR II
as 1:2019cv03536
Plaintiff:
REEDLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, PORTLAND ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, HENDERSON HOSPITAL, LLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
In Re: ALLINA II-TYPE DSH ADJUSTMENT CASES
as 1:2019mc00190
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
In Re:
ALLINA II-TYPE DSH ADJUSTMENT CASES
Plaintiff:
COOKEVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUTHORITY, MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, INC., ST. JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02173
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT HOSPITAL PARTNERS, LP, VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
